<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rachel Maddow&#8217;s distant relationship with the truth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bookwormroom.com/2012/11/21/rachel-maddows-distant-relationship-with-the-truth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2012/11/21/rachel-maddows-distant-relationship-with-the-truth/</link>
	<description>Conservatives deal with facts and reach conclusions; liberals have conclusions and sell them as facts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 04:55:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SCOTTtheBADGER</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2012/11/21/rachel-maddows-distant-relationship-with-the-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-148741</link>
		<dc:creator>SCOTTtheBADGER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 12:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=25315#comment-148741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have heard her amusingly refered to as Rachel Madcow.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have heard her amusingly refered to as Rachel Madcow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Martel</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2012/11/21/rachel-maddows-distant-relationship-with-the-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-148727</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Martel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 00:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=25315#comment-148727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like most here, I can&#039;t take Maddow for more than a minute or two. Life is too short to engage in eternal fisking. 
 
But she does have her uses: Maddow is an outlier who lets us know what bizarre notions the more rabid and radically uninformed segment of the progressive world is feasting on. As we begin the war to take back the culture and the media, it&#039;s good to know the most outré forms of opposition and rationalization we&#039;re going to run into.
 
Also, I take heart knowing that she doesn&#039;t exactly have national prominence or all that big a following. Yesterday&#039;s TV viewership numbers (tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com), admittedly a snapshot, show her with 1.27 million viewers---roughly 1 in every 250 Americans is tuning in to her. You get the feeling that watching a butch Marxist prevaricator just isn&#039;t all that entertaining for the great majority of us. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like most here, I can&#8217;t take Maddow for more than a minute or two. Life is too short to engage in eternal fisking.<br />
 <br />
But she does have her uses: Maddow is an outlier who lets us know what bizarre notions the more rabid and radically uninformed segment of the progressive world is feasting on. As we begin the war to take back the culture and the media, it&#8217;s good to know the most outré forms of opposition and rationalization we&#8217;re going to run into.<br />
 <br />
Also, I take heart knowing that she doesn&#8217;t exactly have national prominence or all that big a following. Yesterday&#8217;s TV viewership numbers (tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com), admittedly a snapshot, show her with 1.27 million viewers&#8212;roughly 1 in every 250 Americans is tuning in to her. You get the feeling that watching a butch Marxist prevaricator just isn&#8217;t all that entertaining for the great majority of us. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
