<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yikes!  WordPress is putting everyone&#8217;s comments in WordPress purgatory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bookwormroom.com/2013/02/07/yikes-wordpress-is-putting-everyones-comments-in-wordpress-purgatory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2013/02/07/yikes-wordpress-is-putting-everyones-comments-in-wordpress-purgatory/</link>
	<description>Conservatives deal with facts and reach conclusions; liberals have conclusions and sell them as facts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 03:20:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bizcor</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2013/02/07/yikes-wordpress-is-putting-everyones-comments-in-wordpress-purgatory/comment-page-1/#comment-152097</link>
		<dc:creator>bizcor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 08:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=26621#comment-152097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[this means internet contro; has begun.
Danny it is indeed marsahl law is being tested in Massachusetts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this means internet contro; has begun.<br />
Danny it is indeed marsahl law is being tested in Massachusetts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Devx</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2013/02/07/yikes-wordpress-is-putting-everyones-comments-in-wordpress-purgatory/comment-page-1/#comment-152047</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Devx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 22:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=26621#comment-152047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m going to use this as an open thread.  Gov. Duval Patrick of Massachusetts has issued a &quot;Travel Ban&quot; across his entire state (due to blizzard conditions).  Excerpt:
 
&lt;em&gt;He also announced he has signed an executive order to ban all travel on all roads in the state starting at 4 p.m. Friday.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;em&gt;There are some exceptions to the ban, including emergency workers, those who work in hospitals and media, and others required to be at their jobs.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The governor said rapid snowfall of 2-3 inches per hour will make for, “extremely dangerous conditions,” and will “make safe travel nearly impossible.”&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;em&gt;This is the first time that a Massachusetts governor has issued an executive order like this since the Blizzard of 1978.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;em&gt;But back then it was put in place after the storm.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Patrick did not say when this ban would be lifted.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;em&gt;If you don’t have an exemption and you’re caught on the road, the penalty could be as steep as a $500 fine or, at worst, a year in jail.&lt;/em&gt;
 
What do you all think of such a &quot;travel ban&quot;.  Clearly he thinks it is &quot;for your own good&quot;.  But why have we given our leaders the right to ban our travel under any conditions?  If I want to put my life at risk by travelling, why shouldn&#039;t I be able to?  Is this related to regulations - perhaps if I get into danger, they are required by law to try to rescue me?  Well, I&#039;d like to waive that &quot;right&quot;!  Is it due to lawsuits by such &quot;endangered idiots&quot; against the government?  
 
I&#039;m sure people are allowed to walk to stores to purchase needed goods.  What if I&#039;ve got a sprained ankle and cannot walk?  Shouldn&#039;t I be allowed to drive if I believe it to be necessary?  
 
If I, as a government leader, can ban your travel due to certain conditions such as these, under what other conditions am I allowed to restrict your movements?  When can I?  When can&#039;t I?  What precedents have been set?  This all seems very odd to me.  Perhaps a travel notice: &quot;Emergency conditions have caused us to rescind all government rescue activities except those we deem critically important to maintaining civil authority.  Travel from 4 pm Friday onward is entirely at your own risk&quot;.  Perhaps that would be more appropriate for a nation of free citizens (who are not sheep).
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to use this as an open thread.  Gov. Duval Patrick of Massachusetts has issued a &#8220;Travel Ban&#8221; across his entire state (due to blizzard conditions).  Excerpt:<br />
 <br />
<em>He also announced he has signed an executive order to ban all travel on all roads in the state starting at 4 p.m. Friday.</em><br />
<em>There are some exceptions to the ban, including emergency workers, those who work in hospitals and media, and others required to be at their jobs.</em><br />
<em>The governor said rapid snowfall of 2-3 inches per hour will make for, “extremely dangerous conditions,” and will “make safe travel nearly impossible.”</em><br />
<em>This is the first time that a Massachusetts governor has issued an executive order like this since the Blizzard of 1978.</em><br />
<em>But back then it was put in place after the storm.</em><br />
<em>Patrick did not say when this ban would be lifted.</em><br />
<em>If you don’t have an exemption and you’re caught on the road, the penalty could be as steep as a $500 fine or, at worst, a year in jail.</em><br />
 <br />
What do you all think of such a &#8220;travel ban&#8221;.  Clearly he thinks it is &#8220;for your own good&#8221;.  But why have we given our leaders the right to ban our travel under any conditions?  If I want to put my life at risk by travelling, why shouldn&#8217;t I be able to?  Is this related to regulations &#8211; perhaps if I get into danger, they are required by law to try to rescue me?  Well, I&#8217;d like to waive that &#8220;right&#8221;!  Is it due to lawsuits by such &#8220;endangered idiots&#8221; against the government?  <br />
 <br />
I&#8217;m sure people are allowed to walk to stores to purchase needed goods.  What if I&#8217;ve got a sprained ankle and cannot walk?  Shouldn&#8217;t I be allowed to drive if I believe it to be necessary?  <br />
 <br />
If I, as a government leader, can ban your travel due to certain conditions such as these, under what other conditions am I allowed to restrict your movements?  When can I?  When can&#8217;t I?  What precedents have been set?  This all seems very odd to me.  Perhaps a travel notice: &#8220;Emergency conditions have caused us to rescind all government rescue activities except those we deem critically important to maintaining civil authority.  Travel from 4 pm Friday onward is entirely at your own risk&#8221;.  Perhaps that would be more appropriate for a nation of free citizens (who are not sheep).<br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
