Kudos to George Galloway for letting the Left’s full Israel hatred show


Left-wing British Member of Parliament George Galloway, who’s always been pro-Palestinian, finally let the mask drop and showed his full Israel/Jewish hatred:

Controversial Left-wing MP George Galloway shocked an Oxford University audience by refusing to debate with an opponent because he was Israeli.

To cries of ‘racism’, Mr Galloway picked up his coat and stormed out of the hall.

The Respect MP had been booked to appear in the debate at Christ Church college and had spoken for ten minutes in favour of the motion that ‘Israel should withdraw immediately from the West Bank’.

But when his opponent, Eylon Aslan-Levy, began putting the opposing view, Mr Galloway took umbrage at learning he was an Israeli.

Film of the incident shows Mr Aslan-Levy, 21, a third-year philosophy, politics and economics student at Brasenose College, using ‘we’ in reference to Israel.

Mr Galloway can be heard muttering: ‘Did he say “we”?’ before interrupting his opponent.

‘You said “we”,’ said the Bradford West MP. ‘Are you an Israeli?’ ‘I am, yes,’ Mr Aslan-Levy replied.

‘I don’t debate with Israelis. I have been misled. Sorry,’ said Mr Galloway.

As he reached the door, he added: ‘I don’t recognise Israel, and I don’t debate with Israelis,’ before storming out of the room.

Galloway’s behavior is disgusting, racist, antisemitic, and anti-Israel. It’s also wonderful insofar as it rips off the gooey, sweet, PC mask that the Left uses to cover its censorship and hatred and when it comes to opposing views. This is what BDS (Boycott, Divest, and Sanction) is all about. This is what anti-Israel rhetoric is all about. The Left doesn’t want a two-state solution. The Left doesn’t want to see Palestinians and Israel reach an accord. What the Left wants is to see Israel and Jews silenced — and Galloway is no longer making a pretense that he has any other goal.

Galloway is as disgusting a human being as it’s possible to be, but he gets kudos today for being sufficiently useful to reveal the core ugliness that lies at the heart of the Leftist approach to Israel and the Middle East.

Be Sociable, Share!
  • http://OgBlog.net Earl

    Galloway’s mask has dropped but England is naked. Caroline Glicks sums it up …” there is no future for Jews in England.” 
    And not much of a future for little girls victimized by FGM either. The UK has never prosecuted a single case. 

  • Libby

    I have mixed feelings about the many recent instances of the Left’s mask slipping. Yes, it’s nice to hear someone openly declare they really do hate Israel or really do believe abortion is killing a baby (but so what?). However, this new boldness seems to indicate that they no longer fear repercussions or that they’re certain enough people think the same way that there won’t be any repercussions. There certainly hasn’t been enough fall out from Obama’s poor treatment of Netanyahu & Israel (Hagel has enough votes now, right?), and NY Gov. Cuomo is currently pushing an extreme expansion of abortion rights.

  • Mike Devx

    Oh, Sadie, the FGM (female genital mutilation) article is horrible and sad.
    I wonder how much of it is happening here in the USA in Muslim enclaves in the shadows and we just don’t know about it yet?  Think Dearborn, MI and areas of Minnesota, and other enclaves…
    As we proceed inevitably down the road to granting these enclaves Sharia law – and we will, if Europe is any guide – the cases of FGM will increase.  And they will emerge from the shadows.  We are fortunate to view in today’s Europe our own future, in the effect of granting Shariah law and in the end effects of Statist economic policy.  But we still refuse to see.  So far.

  • Charles Martel

    Galloway’s snit will be noted only by our likes. It won’t cause a stir on the left because it won’t be reported.
    While I’m happy when one of the left’s primo morons lets slip the mask of Jew hatred, it’s much akin to my happiness at the sun rising in the morning: What else was I expecting?

  • LSBeene

    Don’t you love how his ORIGINAL talking points position is that Israel should give up the West Bank, in order to show the world they were reasonable, would compromise, and wanted peace.
    But, as many have said – his mask slipped.
    He does not recognize Israel?  So, then, when Israel gives up the West Bank, is that going to change?  If not, then his premise is false and he’s a dishonest broker.
    He won’t debate an Israeli?  Why not?  Regardless of political stripe – if your idea is well founded, can stand on its’ own merits, and is defensible then one would think you (or I) would WELCOME the chance to debate with our foes.
    He would not debate, IMO, because he does not believe in Israel’s right to exist, and to debate an Israeli would lend (to him) “false’ legitimacy to a (in his mind) “non-person” or “invader”.
    He would not debate, IMO, because the Israeli debater would use FACTS and the facts are on the Israeli side.
    Now be very clear: I came to side with Israel because I learned the history of the region, because I heard both sides, and, further, I watched how the Arabs (Palestinian or not) have acted and how the Israelis have acted.
    Point – Set – Match to Israel.