Comments on: Coming soon — your constitutional right to bestiality?

By: beefrank

beefrank — Wed, 13 Mar 2013 19:12:51 +0000

Does PETA endorse this act? Is it pain or pleasure?

By: Earl

Earl — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 19:12:55 +0000

“The law presumes that children are injured when an adult has sex with them and it also states that children cannot legally give consent.”

This presumption is already under attack, and the bestiality cases will only accelerate the trend.

It’s going to get VERY ugly.

By: Danny Lemieux

Danny Lemieux — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 14:27:50 +0000

How do I know that Carlos is a big-D Democrat? Because the “D” in Democrat stands for “Defining Deviant Donkeys Downward”.

By: Caped Crusader

Caped Crusader — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 05:22:06 +0000

It just gets crazier every day, n’est pas? This is where destroying long held societal morays must eventually lead. Why should marriage not be two men, seven women, a sheep, two donkeys, etc. And how in heaven’s name can we not now pay reparations to the Mormons for outlawing what they called plural marriage?

And now a message from another king, predating Elvis. Roy Acuff, the king of country music:

By: Michael Adams

Michael Adams — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 03:37:24 +0000

OK. Y’all are just too far from your cages. BTW, there was, maybe still is, a bar/restaurant in Austin called Carlos and Charlies.

By: Charles Martel

Charles Martel — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 02:51:50 +0000

I’ve always been interested in bestiality. I remember how impressed my teacher was in 12th grade when I told her that I intended to read the classic “Donkey Hōtie” by Miguel de Cervantes entirely in the original Spanish.

I have the sneaking suspicion that Carlos and I would get along famously.

By: Spartacus

Spartacus — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 02:29:06 +0000

Fabianism.

When DADT was repealed, it was reported that it was done so by removing one little section of the UCMJ which defined sodomy as something that could occur with someone of the same sex, the opposite sex, or an animal (sex unspecified). It would have been perfectly easy just to come up with a different wording so as to maintain the prohibition against going to the zoo, but they didn’t.

It may just have been an oversight, but the hard-left clowns driving the agenda in DC really do seem, like porn addicts, to be trying to measure the maximum depth of depravity.

Save the animals! (The four-footed ones, not the ones abusing the 14th Amendment.)

By: SADIE

SADIE — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 01:54:19 +0000

Michael, See what happens when you go off the reservation. What’s next… Fifty Shades of Grey Donkey.

By: Michael Adams

Michael Adams — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 01:27:26 +0000

I don't know who is more to be condemned, you, for getting entirely too much enjoyment from writing this piece, or I for enjoying every double entendre in what you wrote. We should both be ashamed, and I will be, as soon as I can stop laughing. "Mount a defense?" Please!

By: SADIE

SADIE — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 01:26:00 +0000

“…Carlos said, because it would have been difficult to mount an appeal challenging the law if he had been sent to jail.”

Oh Bookworm, you went there didn’t you.