Comments on: Professional atheist Richard Dawkins says adult pigs are more human that human fetuses

By: Ymarsakar

Ymarsakar — Wed, 20 Mar 2013 12:39:16 +0000

Dawkins wouldn’t be in the situation he is if his profit/science didn’t come from abortion sources.

Dawkins has reached the same conclusion as Planned Parenthood founder, Margaret genocide Sanger. The professor’s “evolutionary biology” leads to his intellectual conclusions.

When people come to believe that this is so, his views will be received in a very different light than it is today. Currently, all too many are busy considering Dawkins’ personal credentials and intellect as if it mattered.

So long as people believe someone has authority, power, or resources of an intellectual nature, they will continue to be led to oblivion as lemmings by the Pied Pipers of the world. Until they realize the true source of things, people will continue to be mystified why such authorities and intellectual giants think so.

By: raymondjelli

raymondjelli — Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:32:28 +0000

An utterly insensible idea by Dawkins who is not stupid (at least in the academic sense). The mother truly cares about that mass of cells and abortions can be quite emotionally traumatic. By Dawkins own logic the fact that the mother takes care of herself during pregnancy and identifies with the baby to come (for more so than she identifies with a pig on a farm) should tell Dawkins there is something more there than a collection of cells. We all do know his reply would be that is either instinct or illogical. “Logic” being the fallback position for atheists.

By: Mike Devx

Mike Devx — Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:39:20 +0000

Such a strange comment, coming from a so-called scientist such as Mr. Dawkins. I’ve read a Dawkins book, several years ago. The man knows about DNA. I bet if pressed for an explanation, he would say that he meant a blastula or undeveloped fetus, and the differentiation of cells into organs such that eyes, ears, mouth, digestive tract, etc, etc, are all present.

But what his statement represents to me is a profound hostility toward the value of human life itself. The manner in which you discuss an issue reveals a lot about you. Dr. Dawkins has revealed a lot about himself with his choice of analogy. It ain’t pretty at all.

By: Charles Martel

Charles Martel — Mon, 18 Mar 2013 07:15:55 +0000

I was incensed when I first learned that Warner Brothers had decided to name the pig it had under contract for cartoon appearances “Porky.” It was an insulting, demeaning name.

However, I later learned that the studio had given the pig a speech therapist and had called in a short-order tailor to fashion pants for him. Only humans would think to do such things for an ambulatory chop.

By: Earl

Earl — Mon, 18 Mar 2013 04:38:21 +0000

When was the last time you mourned a pig, Mr. Dawkins?

By: Oldflyer

Oldflyer — Mon, 18 Mar 2013 04:28:53 +0000

Every time I hear something like this I think of my twin grandchildren who were born two months early. At one moment they were simply lumps of fetal matter, the next they were living human beings. Really? Now sixteen years afterward they both are scholar athletes and the joy of all who know them. How can this be? Were they really candidates for abortion in the moments before their birth simply, because the calendar had not turned over? At what point in those last two months might they have migrated from a choice to a viable human?
The girl just donated bone marrow to her older sister with leukemia, the boy was the back up donor. What if someone had decided that they might not be viable at seven months, or that the two months they would spend in post-natal ICU was too expensive?
If Dawkins can explain all of this in terms of that make sense to a thinking human being, I am listening.

By: Ron19

Ron19 — Mon, 18 Mar 2013 03:20:07 +0000

Obviously, the biologist Dr. Richard Dawkins does not beleive in DNA, except when abortion is not under discussion.

File this under ”A pig’s right to choose.”

By: Freddie Sykes

Freddie Sykes — Mon, 18 Mar 2013 02:47:56 +0000

The late, great Ricardo Montalban was once asked his thoughts on abortion. He said that if his mother has aborted him, he would never have existed. Ricardo evolved a great deal from when he was less than a pig in his mother’s womb. Pigs, if they could talk, could not make the same claim.