Drudge editor says that there’s another major scandal lurking

In an earlier post, I put forth my theory that most scandals affect only political players, so people get excited only if the media stirs up excitement.  The IRS scandal is different, because it affects all of us but, like Pavlov’s dogs, we’re still trained only to get excited if the media tells us to.  So, even though Americans should care, they don’t.

According to Joseph Curl, a Drudge editor, there’s another scandal in the wings, and it’s a biggie:

Big Obama scandal in the wings

Which leads me to wonder whether what kind of scandal it is:  Is it a biggie to insider players, so it will matter only if the media makes it matter?  Is it a biggie to the public, but they won’t appreciate it if the media tells them to ignore it?  Or is it so big that the media will be helpless to stop it?

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments

  1. jj says

    And is it what they brought up the IRS deal to deflect?  I have, as you know, been wondering why they did that.  There was no compulsion, they just did it – and you’ll have to pardon my cynicism for supposing that they did not do it because they suddenly found religion, or suddenly developed a nose for right and wrong, or a taste for flagellation.  It was done to divert and deflect – something.  The question is: what?

  2. says

    I suspect they did it to avoid people finding out that Obama regime supplied AQ with stinger missiles. Which, coincidentally, happened about the same time special forces helicopters in Afghanistan kept getting shot down.

  3. Libby says

    If they’re rally that scared then it must be something that would upset Obama’s own supporters. While I think the Benghazi stinger missiles is a possibility, the benghazi scandal in general has already been dismissed by the Dems and the MSM. I would bank on something that affects the MSM and the Dems personally, such as much more widespread monitoring and investigation of the press, members of Congress, and/or career higher-ups in government. You can see overreach in both the AP and Rosen subpoenas (getting Rosen’s parent’s phone records!), and in the way that they were monitoring Petraues’ affair (and revealed it when it was politically useful).

  4. says

    Petraeus was being black mailed to keep his mouth shut about the CIA and State actions in Libya, Obama’s secret war and alliance with AQ.
     
    Petraeus decided he was going to fire his own gun into himself in public rather than wait for Obama to pull the trigger.
     
     

  5. says

    What I want to hear is simple. I want to hear all those people who were talking about making bipartisan deals and compromises with Democrats, I want to hear all those anti-gun legislation people talking about protecting children and people from “crimes”, I want to hear them talk. But only in person, not on the net.
     
     

Leave a Reply