Michael Walsh predicts a “Republican Spring”

In 2011, we had the Arab Spring.  Michael Walsh is now predicting a “Republican Spring” which we all hope will end more successfully than the unfolding disaster in the Middle East:

In the aftermath of Senator Ted Cruz’s epic performance on the Senate floor, a few observations:

After his disgraceful attacks on Cruz, including his reach-across-the-aisle, dog-in-the-manger response today, this should be the end of Senator John McCain as a voice of influence in the Republican party. Ditto his mini-me, Senator Lindsey Graham. Indeed, the entire Old Guard of business-as-usual “comity” fans passeth. When you care more about what the other side thinks, it’s probably time either to switch teams or step down.

There is new leadership in the GOP, whether the party wants to admit it or not: Cruz, Rand Paul, Mike Lee, Jeff Sessions, and the others who stepped into the breach to spell the senator from Texas.

The popular reaction to Cruz will be immediate and noticeable; the more the old bulls carp, the more the public will rally to Cruz’s side. The country has been spoiling for a real fight since the election of 2008, and now it has one.

Conservatives have finally realized that, as it’s currently constituted, they have no home in the Republican party, which is the Washington Generals to the Democrats’ Harlem Globetrotters, the designated losers who nevertheless are rewarded handsomely for their sham opposition.

To that end, conservatives understand that rather than form a third party, their only hope is to seize control of the corrupt, rotting hulk of the GOP, which they now can do with the help of a reinvigorated Tea Party — especially with Lois Lerner’s IRS off its back.

The Cruz faction in the Senate, and its allies in the House (whose leadership is now up for grabs) must now press their advantage. The louder the Democrats squawk, the more they are wounded; the one thing they’ve long feared is a direct assault on their core beliefs as translated into actions, and the deleterious effects of Obamacare, just now being felt by the population, are the most vivid proof of the failure of Progressivism that conservatives could wish for.

Please the rest here.  Every word is interesting.

I’m actually quite optimistic because a Republican Spring will be predicted on individual freedom, unlike the Arab Spring, which was predicated on subordination to a tyrannical theocracy.  The only risk is that a party predicated on freedom tends to organize badly and have all the coherence and stability of a room full of soap bubbles.

ADDENDUM:  Things are happening quickly and in unpredictable ways.  I’ve been thinking a lot about that since our trip to St. Petersburg this summer.  As you know, Obama and the rest of the progressives keep talking about being on the “right side of history.”  This isn’tt history that’s happened yet, of course.  It’s what they assume historians in the future will say as they look back upon our present.  In other words, progressives think that they can see the future.

When I was growing up, though, no one saw the Soviet Union’s future, something made staggeringly clear to me when we spent two days in St. Petersburg this summer.  The kids, who were born long after the wall fell, could not comprehend the fact that my husband and I were still stunned by the rampant capitalism there.  Right up until the wall fell, no one could have predicted that the heart and soul of communism would have streets lined with advertisements for Prada.  Perhaps it was more predictable that it would become corrupt but, throughout the 1990s, I didn’t see that coming either.  Now, though, everyone to whom we spoke told us that life in Putin’s Russia is hopelessly corrupt, and that they’re enjoying their window of freedom while they can, since they fear it will end soon.

And on that subject, Clifford D. May looks at a possible Third Act to follow upon Russia’s twisty-turny recent past and tumultuous present.

Be Sociable, Share!
  • Mike Devx

    I agree with every one of Mr. Walsh’s bullet points that you showed us, Book.
     
    In particular, this point:
     
    > The louder the Democrats squawk, the more they are wounded; the one thing they’ve long feared is a direct assault on their core beliefs as translated into actions
     
    We have to remember, ONLY when the Democrats squawk and attack and vilify, are we really threatening anything they care about.  If they’re silent or quiet, then we’re doing exactly what they want us to do.
     
    And you’ll note who they are attacking and vilifying these days.  It’s not McCain, or Lindsey Graham.  It’s not Mitch McConnell.  Only occasionally, and rarely, is it John Boehner – but I will give him *some* minor amount of credit for sometimes doing the right thing.  But he has to always be dragged kicking and screaming into doing it!
     
    The GOP *must* change.
     

  • http://ymarsakar.wordpress.com Ymarsakar

    Don’t really disagree with the points listed.
     
    Devx is quite correct about Democrat responses. They only gear up their national propaganda arm when a real threat shows up.
     
     

  • Charles Martel

    Obama’s balloon has been popped, and no amount of huffing and puffing by the MSM is going to re-inflate it. So watch the rats jump ship, a few to begin with, then large numbers as Obama flounders, and swim as fast as their little rodent legs can stroke over to the good ship Hillary.
     
    There they will proclaim that they always knew that dark skin wouldn’t be enough to solve the nation’s problems, so now it’s time to bring on a vulva!

  • Danny Lemieux

    Whereupon Seigneur Martel wades in among the rats, playing whack-a-mole with his hammer. Good show, old chap! I shall lift a pint or two (or three) to his honor.