A feral bureaucracy will do anything it can to protect itself

Catherine Engelbrecht’s testimony should be heard far and wide throughout America.  A feral bureaucracy will do anything it can to protect itself.  Right now, Obama’s is the lawless government, but back in the early 1970s, it was Nixon who began to push the boundaries.  Right now, the bureaucracy owes its allegiance to the Democrats.  That can change.  But no matter who’s in charge, if Americans of all political stripes do not act now to stop the federal government’s unconstitutional activities, freedom of speech and freedom of association are over:

Be Sociable, Share!
  • Pingback: A feral bureaucracy will do anything it can to protect itself | GulfDogs()

  • http://ymarsakar.wordpress.com Ymarsakar

    The Left, having used 501s as equivalent to an army regiment, will never allow their enemies to make use of their own resources and tactics.
    This isn’t the Hollywood movies, where you can merely choose to fight poison with poison, fire with fire. In the real world, the fire won’t let you use fire against it.

  • http://ymarsakar.wordpress.com Ymarsakar

    Nixon didn’t push the boundaries at all. Nothing he ordered and even the things he didn’t order, were all things the FBI and Democrats had already done to accrue a certain advantage.

  • http://roarkmj.blogspot.com/ MikeR

    Barring any tempering influence, such as western religion, or natural market limits or an un-biased news system, bureaucracies devolve into ghastly beasts.

  • http://OgBlog.net Earl

    Ymar is right — Nixon did/tried to do NOTHING that hadn’t been done by Dems for decades.
    And saying “Right now, the bureaucracy owes its allegiance to the Democrats.  That can change. ” is one of three things — ignorant, disingenuous, or an attempt to be even-handed where even-handedness is not necessary, but a sign of weakness.
    Everyone who knows ANY history knows that during the lifetime of anyone still breathing today, the government bureaucracy has been Democrat, and that bureaucracy has obstructed Republican Administrations with the same zeal that it has advanced the cause of Democrat Administrations.
    Please provide contrary information, if possible.  I could use some cheering-up!

    • http://ymarsakar.wordpress.com Ymarsakar

      The FBI wasn’t particularly Democrat aligned during WWII times. The bureaucracy was its own power bloc of competing factions, but during sometime the last half of the last century, the DC bureaucracy became full members of the Leftist alliance, bringing their war potential to the front lines of the fight for the American soul.
      If the FBI helped out Democrat politicians like FDR get intel on his enemies, it was mostly a testament to the iron will and power of the Democrat party, founding members of the Leftist alliance in the US.

  • http://ymarsakar.wordpress.com Ymarsakar

    One time Bookworm wrote years ago about why she writes online anonymously. While some, and even herself, may have questioned the moral courage or fortitude of this choice, I advocated that there were necessary conditions and benefits to be had from anonymity.
    And now people know what I was really thinking of, but left unsaid, for what those benefits truly were. The video up there featuring that woman, can be any woman you know that engages too heavily in the front lines with the Left. It is not an envious position or a position just any one should go for. It requires planning and deliberate risk taking, risk calculations and assessment as part of a strategic envelope conducted in a specific tactical sphere.
    I also demonstrated certain memory functions concerning what people said on the internet ages ago, which I did not forget. That skill set was an emulation of what I was studying at the time, which was how to counter open source data mining by enemy factions in the US. Not outside, inside. It’s much easier to defend against an attack if you knew how to conduct the attack. All of it would have sounded very crazy if broadcasted on an open level, unencrypted format. It was easier to allow the Left to convince people for me, as it is less risky that way.

  • http://ymarsakar.wordpress.com Ymarsakar

    Catherine Engelbrecht’s fight is a good one. But know this, Leftist zombies. Even if you succeed in defeating her, that will not be the end for you. For you will be on the List and that will mean a certain something during and at the end of this war.
    If the enemies of American patriotism think the only thing they have to fear are Sarah Palins and peaceful activists like CE here… they should understand something. Both Malcom X and Martin Luther King were necessary conditions for social change. What does that mean? I’ll let people figure that one out for themselves.