Nothing I can add to this superb Bill Whittle video:
Having now watched episodes 6 and 7 in House of Cards, I’m done with the show. I’m freeing up several hours of my life to read books, write, visit with friends — indeed, do anything but watch something that’s turned into yet another boring, polemic, Leftist wish factory.
BEWARE — HERE BE SPOILERS. If you haven’t given up on House of Cards, don’t read past this paragraph. You’ll regret it if you do.
It’s a bad thing when our president is happy
My Mom, in commenting on the state of the world today, said “Everybody’s unhappy.” I disagreed. “Obama is happy,” I said. “So is Iran.”
Why are these two happy? Because Obama is working on a grand plan that will hand the Middle East over to nuclear Imams from Iran, that’s why. Victor Davis Hanson carefully breaks the Obama strategy down. You should definitely read VDH’s post, but be prepared to be depressed for hours or even days afterwards.
As for those Sunni outposts that Iran cannot reach or does not want to control, there’s always Obama’s good friend The Muslim Brotherhood.
And that’s why Obama’s happy.
The Jordanian pilot’s immolation is even making Progressives scared . . . except for Obama
Wow! Can you imagine if American elections had commercials this good? It plays at so many levels: Superficially, it’s just plain funny. It also subtly and ably attacks the candidates running against Netayanhu. Lastly, at a very visceral level, the commercial forces voters to ask themselves which candidate will best care for their children — all without mentioning any of the ugly threats facing Israel:
Hat tip: Sadie
Alinsky rule No. 13: “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”
Senior officials in the White House have said that Israel Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu “is desperate and weak,” in reaction to Netanyahu’s remonstrations against the deal struck with Iran over its nuclear weapons program.
Israeli television Channel 10 quoted the officials as saying “His pronouncements show a lack of self-confidence,” in an unusually harsh personal attack on Netanyahu. “We are not perturbed by his vocal opposition.”
In fact, given that Israel’s former friend just stabbed her in the back and put a target on her for Iran’s benefit, Netanyahu is acting powerfully, not weakly. Weak would be to acquiesce to this evil conduct (and I have mentioned before that Obama has now aligned America with an Axis of Evil or an Evil Empire?). Strong is to speak out loudly, repeatedly, and clearly against a Chamberlain-esque travesty of “peace.”
Hat tip: Gateway Pundit
The photo above must be one of the most iconic images from the hippie, anti-war period. A youthful anti-Vietnam War protester, faced with a ring of National Guard troops pointing their rifles at him, carefully places a flower in each muzzle. He thinks, no doubt, that the flowers have magically converted the guns into harmless instruments. The troops, however, know that their rifles are still rifles. The only thing that’s preventing them from firing is their inherent decency and, of course, the lack of any order telling them to pull the trigger. The flower didn’t change anything; it’s the underlying morality that matters.
I thought of this liberal delusion — that guns can magically be transformed into harmless flowers — when Hube brought to my attention the clarity with which Benjamin Netanyahu spoke about the existential threat facing Israel, and about the West’s passivity in the face of this threat:
“The leaders of the Allies knew about the Holocaust in real time,” Netanyahu said at the opening of a permanent exhibit called “Shoah” in Block 27 at the Auschwitz- Birkenau State Museum.
“They understood exactly what was happening in the death camps. They were asked to act, they could have acted, and they did not.
“To us Jews the lesson is clear: We must not be complacent in the face of threats of annihilation. We must not bury our heads in the sand or allow others to do the work for us. We will never be helpless again.”
To stare down the muzzle of a rifle is a remarkably clarifying moment. Why aren’t we having such clarifying moments in America despite the Islamists’ relentless war against America and Western values? I think the problem is perfectly summed up by the young man in that photo: reality-challenged Progressive think that, by pretending the rifle is a flower, it will magically become one. That’s not how rifles or flowers work.
America’s not the only one with crazed Leftists. I managed to miss the fact that Former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert just accused Sheldon Adelson of using Benjamin Netanyahu as his puppet in this election. Adelson utterly destroys that canard and, to my delight, he does so in three short paragraphs that are a triumph of classic logic over arrant nonsense. Go there and enjoy!
We all recall how Michael Moore mercilessly savaged George Bush because, when the first reports about the 9/11 terrorist attacks began, Bush was reading a story book to small children, and chose not to run screaming out of the room. Fast-forward eleven years and we have a president who boasts that he’s better than everybody at doing anything. Apparently he’s now decided to one-up Bush’s insouciance in the face of imminent disaster.
Yesterday was not a good day for America. First, it was the eleventh anniversary of the most deadly attack ever launched against U.S. soil. More than 3,000 American civilians died, horribly, over the course of a few hours, and they did so at the hands of people in thrall to radical Islam. Obama celebrated this anniversary by campaigning, talking music with a pimp with a limp, and by sending a nice message to the Arab Forum on Asset Recovery. Feckless.
Moving on from past tragedy to imminent disaster, radical Islamists attacked the U.S. Embassy in Cairo. The Embassy responded before the attack by apologizing explicitly for Free Speech and doubled-down on that apology after the attack. Hillary Clinton — Obama’s highest State Department official — reiterated the spineless apology. The administration has tried now to walk back the statement, claiming that it didn’t authorize it (something that rings untrue in light of Hillary’s conduct) but the damage is done:
But the damage control being performed in Washington isn’t enough to put the administration’s stand in a positive light. If the initial apology resonated around the world it was because it was very much in line with the tone of moral equivalence that was the keynote of President Obama’s speech to the Arab world given in Cairo in June 2009. Having set forth a credo that balanced understanding for grievances against U.S. policies with a desire to conciliate its critics rather than to forthrightly defend America and its allies, the president cannot now be surprised when the instinct of U.S. representatives abroad, and especially those in Cairo, is to apologize first and to be resolute later.
The news of what happened in Egypt was swiftly followed by a report that “rebels” had stormed the American embassy in Benghazi, killing one person. It only got worse. We learned today that Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three others were deliberately murdered — Christopher by alleged “suffocation,” and the three others by gun shots. The murderers than did the usual Arab thing of dragging the Ambassador’s body through the streets. Honestly, they’re so primitive out there that, if it wasn’t for the Koran’s dietary proscriptions, I suspect they would have gone all Aztec or Druid and eaten his heart.
Obama’s response was swift: He’s heading for Vegas. He did take time out from his busy campaign season this morning, however, to make a short statement. Considering that he used this statement to jettison the First Amendment, maybe it would have been better if he’d just kept quiet and gotten on the Vegas plane.
Romney, incidentally, gave a speech in favor of Free Speech. He clearly understands that yesterday’s events are not the pathetic Arab have-nots standing up against the arrogant and cruel American haves. Instead, what we saw yesterday was the latest outbreak in a war between the backwards, repressed, bloodthirsty world and American exceptionalism, a doctrine founded on individual freedom, which is inextricably intertwined with Free Speech.
Maybe it’s no wonder that Obama was caught flat-footed. He’s been so busy with campaigns and phone calls to rock stations and TV appearances that he hasn’t had any time for security briefings in the last week. Yet more evidence, as if we need it, that Obama’s priorities are all about . . . Obama. Feckless wretch.
Obama didn’t do any better in his dealings with Israel’s existential nightmare — a nuclear Iran. The first reports were that Obama refused to speak to Netanhayu at all. Fear not, Obama fans. This doesn’t mean he’s too busy to do the really important stuff, such as making an appearance on David Letterman’s show.
When the uproar became too great to tolerate, Obama announced that he spoke on the phone for one hour with Netanyahu. Think about that: Israel, America’s only stable, democratic ally in the Middle East is facing a potential nuclear holocaust, and Obama is able to carve out a single hour from his busy schedule of shmoozing and begging for money. As Roger Simon asks, how can Jews continue to ally themselves with Obama and Democrat party?
The situation between Israel and Iran is heating up dramatically. Yesterday, Iran boasted it has a missile that can reach any Israeli city. For years, Iran has been loud and clear about it’s intense desire to incinerate Israel. The IAEA has conceded that Iran is on the verge of having nuclear weapons. With all this, Israel is rightfully nervous. So, naturally, Netanyahu wants to talk to the country that is, ostensibly at least, Israel’s greatest ally. And keep in mind that, even if we’re not Israel’s greatest ally (I think Canada probably is right now), we’ve technically been at war with Iran since 1979.
So what does Obama do? He says “No, I will not talk to you PM Netanyahu.” And why won’t Obama talk? Because he is too busy:
Yup, it’s right there on Drudge (in the upper left hand corner): Obama’s “schedule full.” This is a guy who spent more hours on the golf course than he did either spending time at his national security briefing or meeting with his job’s council. So one has to ask: Does Obama think that a potential Armageddon is not a good reason to cancel just one round of golf?
Obama, is a very, very bad man:
UPDATE: How could I have been so wrong? The President didn’t snub Netanyahu, a friendly nation facing an existential threat, because the President wanted to play golf. Really! What was I thinking? I don’t appreciate our President at all. The reason he’s got a full schedule is so that he has to go on the Letterman show. That explains it, of course. My bad.
I guess he also needed time to spend on September 11, a sacred day of mourning to many Americans, campaigning (although he promised not to do so) and apologizing for Americans’ exercise of Free Speech. What a guy! What an American president. Really, it makes me all teary eyed to think that he’s ours.
As a Jew, the Holocaust is always with me. When I whine about something (which I often do), I’m instantly stricken with guilt because I know that, 70 years ago, across Europe, women with lives similar to mine (middle-aged, middle-class) were suddenly pitched into a nightmarish maelstrom from which there was no escape.
Am I shlepping heavy groceries from the car? At least I have food. Do those new shoes I bought pinch my feet? Not only am I shod, but my shoes haven’t been stripped from my body as a preliminary to herding me into a gas chamber. Am I feeling a bit ill or suffering a migraine? I could be laboring in the quarry at Mauthausen, starved, diseased, abused, and alone.
I don’t have survivor’s guilt. I have second-generation survivor’s guilt. On the one hand, I know how lucky I am and how blessed my life is. On the other hand, I can never, ever escape the mental images of those who thought they had my luck, only to see it vanish as if it had never happened.
We only think we’re not on the volcano’s edge. We all are. It’s just that some of us have lives that allow us to pretend the sulfurous fumes aren’t actually rising up around us. I may not live a Hobbesian life at this moment, but there is actually very little between me and a moral entropy that threatens violence and horrible death.
One day a year, we take the inchoate guilt and anxiety that plague most Jews (and many non-Jews?) and declare it an official remembrance day. That day is Yom Hashoah. With every passing year, there are fewer people alive who have first hand memories of the Holocaust. It is therefore up to us to carry the torch and try, through the act of memory, to beat back the darkness surrounding us.
Here is my post on the Holocaust, one that looks at those who lived through it, those who escape from it, and those who were pitched into a Pacific, rather than European, Holocaust.
Here is Bruce Kesler’s post about the village that saw his family’s end.
Here is The Political Commentator’s post.
And here is a link to a book that Bruce recommended: Timothy Snyder’s Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler and Stalin. The book isn’t actually about Europe as a whole. It’s about a specific geographic area bounded by Germany and the Soviet Union, but one that tellingly did not include Germany itself or the core Soviet States. It was in this territory, Belarus, Poland, the Ukraine, etc., that the Nazis and the Soviets put into effect the greatest killing effort in human history, something that would not be seen again until Mao visited his Great Leap Forward on his own hapless Chinese people.
In this geographic area — the Bloodlands of the title — the Soviets and the Nazis systematically starved, shot, gassed, and creatively killed millions of fellow Europeans, many of whom the Nazis shipped in from far-flung geographic points. The victims’ crime? They were enemies of the state, whether because they were Jews, gypsies, farmers, POWs from the opposing side’s armies, political dissidents, political ignoramuses, or anything or anyone else the state feared.
The book’s lesson is clear from the first page: While one can easily find individuals with no conscience, an individual’s reach is limited. That’s not the case when it comes to a start whose citizens allow it to seize unfettered power. A state that has no conscience (and when does a state collective ever have a soul?) can too easily become a killing machine.
When savvy people figure out that I’m a conservative, they often ask why. I think they are surprised when I don’t launch into a long discourse about policies and goals. I say only one thing: “I fear anything that consolidates too much power. The bigger an entity, the more mischief it can do. I like to keep political power reasonable diffused. A government should be big enough to be useful, but not so big that it becomes both unstoppable and very dangerous.”
What Israelis would like to say:
And what Netanyahu, with courage and honesty, actually said at the UN: