We need your help getting the bad employment information past the media’s Iron Curtain

The Romney campaign looked at he numbers.  Will the Obama Media be able to hide this from the American people?

23,136,000: The Number Of Americans Who Are Unemployed, Underemployed, Or Have Stopped Looking For Work. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 9/7/12)

12,544,000: The Number Of Unemployed Workers. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 9/7/12)

8,031,000: The Number Of Workers Working Part-Time For Economic Reasons. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 9/7/12)

5,033,000: The Number Of Workers Who Have Been Unemployed For 27 Weeks Or Longer. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 9/7/12)

1,043,000: Construction Jobs Lost Since President Obama Took Office. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 9/7/12)

582,000 Manufacturing Jobs Lost Since President Obama Took Office. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 9/7/12)

368,000: Workers That Dropped Out Of The Labor Force In August. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 9/7/12)

261,000: Jobs Lost Since President Obama Took Office. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 9/7/12)

41,000: Downward Revision Of Jobs Created Over The Last Two Months. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 9/7/12)

15,000: Manufacturing Jobs Lost In August. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 9/7/12)

1981: The Last Time The Labor Force Participation Rate Was At Its Current Level Of 63.5 Percent. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 9/7/12)

43: Consecutive Months The Unemployment Rate Has Remained Above Eight Percent. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 9/7/12)

39.2 Weeks: The Average Duration Of Unemployment – Nearly Double The 19.8 Weeks When President Obama Took Office. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 9/7/12)

14.7 Percent: The Real Unemployment Rate, Including Those That Are Working Part-Time Due To Economic Reasons. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 9/7/12)

11.2 Percent: The Unemployment Rate Had Labor Force Participation Remained Steady Since President Obama Took Office. (American Enterprise Institute, 9/7/12)

8.4 Percent: The Unemployment Rate Had Labor Force Participation Remained Steady From July. (American Enterprise Institute, 9/7/12)

8.1 Percent: The Unemployment Rate In August. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 9/7/12)

7.8 Percent: The Unemployment Rate When President Obama Took Office. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 9/7/12)

5.4 Percent: The Unemployment Rate President Obama’s Advisers Predicted If We Passed His $787 Billion Stimulus. (Christina Romer and Jared Bernstein, “The Job Impact Of The American Recovery And Reinvestment Plan,”1/9/09)

Since we know the MSM won’t report these numbers, please do what you can to get them past the media Iron Curtain.

About that unemployment rate *UPDATED*

This morning’s headline in the on-line New York Times was that the “Jobless rate soars to 6.7% in November.”  I am really sorry about that.  I know people who have lost jobs, I know people whose jobs are on the line, and I give thanks daily that both my husband and I seem to have stable jobs for the time being.  A high unemployment rate is a bad thing for the nation as a whole and for each unemployed individual.  But (with me, there’s always a but) . . . but:

It’s worthwhile checking out the statistics for a few major Western countries, the ones that the Democrats are so desperate to have us emulate (especially when it comes to increased government control over the economy and ever-higher taxes).

In 2007, Britain had a fairly low unemployment rate at 5.3%.  However, since I keep up very closely with British news, even though I don’t have statistics, I suspect that the unemployment rate reflects the fact that the government itself employs a lot of people, so the numbers may reflect an unemployment rate a la the former Soviet Union in which everyone worked — for the state.

Other major European countries, during an average, non-recessionary year, weren’t doing so well.  In France, the 2007 unemployment rate was 7.9%; in Canada it was 6%; and in Germany, the low estimate for 2007 was 9%, with the high estimate at 10.8%.

I don’t pretend to have any understanding of economics.  I just know that it’s worth thinking about the fact that, even when our jobless rate is soaring, it’s still about the same as (or even much lower than), the regular jobless rate in those countries our new Democratic Congress will seek to emulate.

UPDATE:  Although not quite on point, Jonah Goldberg’s excellent article about the fallacy of “planned” economies (that is, those subject to government, not market, control), seems very apropos when it comes to the Dems thinking, with typical Progressive optimism, that this time they can get government interference to work out right (never mind that it has never, in the past, done so).

UPDATE IIGordon Chang pessimistically throws out a reminder that the worst is yet to come.