In England, the worm is turning
Bookworm on May 24 2009 at 10:47 pm | Filed under: Uncategorized
After years of Muslims marching through British streets, demanding the imposition of Sharia law, and cheering the death of British troops, British people in the town of Luton had enough, and organized their own march. Interestingly first reports are that (a) there’s no claim that the BNP was behind this and (b) despite scattered reports of violence (ignore the hyperbole in the first paragraph, because the report doesn’t bear it out), the signs carried were not racist, but were statements of principle (emphasis mine):
The streets of Luton descended into violence yesterday as hundreds of anti-Islamist protesters clashed with police.
The crowds in the town centre hid their faces behind balaclavas, brandished England flags and chanted at officers.
Some wore masks with the horned face of Sayful Islam, a hardline Muslim activist in Luton who took part in an anti-war rally in March which disrupted a homecoming parade for troops.
The mob, which included teenagers and women, also held banners with slogans such as ‘No Sharia Law in the UK‘ and ‘Respect our Troops‘.
There were reports of violence, with onlookers claiming that an Asian man was hit across the face with a banner and left with a bloody nose.
A group called March for England was said to have organised the rally as a peaceful protest against Muslim extremists. They were joined by a local group United People of Luton.
[snip]
A spokesman for United People of Luton, Wayne King, said: ‘We decided enough was enough after the soldiers got heckled as they marched through the town centre by the Muslim extremists. We want laws brought in to stop preachers of hate operating here.‘
Related posts:
- There won’t always be an England
- Another for the “there won’t always be an England file”
- Ch-ch-ch-changes come again to England
Email This Post To A Friend
17 Responses to “In England, the worm is turning”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
The headline is typical of the British press; i.e., this was a march by a MOB.
It is very sad to witness the ever increasing spiral of British society. There was much to admire.
The UK, like much of Europe, does not have a lot of time to come to their senses. I remember when a North African (probably and Algerian speaking to France) asserted that (sic)”we will overwhelm you with our reproductive capacity”. Well, they don’t need to resort to extraordinary reproduction, because Europe has thrown open the gates and is surrendering its culture. I wonder if we will take note.
That worm better get spinning because it may already be too late.
The Brits turned on their savior, Churchill, after their hides had been saved by his leadership. The gods and the fates themselves scheduled a fateful punishment for such hubris and betrayal. Britain was ordained to fall to fire, death, and suffering by the single moment when Britons decided to turn their backs on their saviors, their colonies, their dependents, and their allies.
Such momentary lapses and partisan domestic political squabbles epitomized in Blair would not change such a fate for Britain.
The Greek Gods were to have said to punish those they disliked with insanity. A marvelously amusing pastime for them. The British post-colonial age saw them not just abandoning their colonies, but replacing them with extraordinarily substitutes that was a violation of the trust the colonists held in Britain, a trust that Britain could not simply abdicate no matter what was most convenient at the time post-WWII.
Betrayal on such a scale will long haunt a nation, oftentimes into an early death. Vietnam came close to doing that for the USA, for was not the culmination of the 60s, Vietnam and the election of Obama? Into the new milllenium we flew, so worried about the passing of one second from 1999 to 2000. But the gods have a sense of humor. We had not dodged the bullet, any more than Britain had dodged the bullet with the coming into power of Churchill. The fate of such nations still remained to the deeds of those nation’s citizens.
Life is not fair and if one generation of citizens proscribes the wrong medication and fatally poisons the nation, the next generation cannot complain nor oftentimes even notice, that they are going to die from the actions of the past.
No more does a child have a choice in the health of the mother. No more does any weakling have a choice when the more powerful have deemed it otherwise.
I believe this is only the beginning of such protests. The Brits have been pushed to the limit by the inequal ‘equality’ laws created by Labour.
The government should know they can only push people so far before they fight back.-one commenter
Fight back with what?
Look up Tony Martin and tell me what the Brits are going to “fight back with”.
The laws are not yours. Your lives are not yours. Your government is not yours. You do not have even have the right to property, because you have nothing, no arms, no training, to defend it.
And as this is true for most of the British, so shall it be true for anyone in Britain, because the individual cannot create a society of trust and security by himself. He needs others. And when those others will not leap to your defense because they have been gelded, you have no society to protect.
The Muslims, they have a society to protect. Their Sharia society. And they are armed with some mediocre though still effective means at mayhem and destabilization.
We have warned our fellow Americans repeatedly at the dangers and the detriments of disarming the population by “banning handguns”. But they do not listen. They do not listen, because they have the luxury, so far, of not needing to listen. But the Brits no longer have the luxury, because it has been too long since they did have that luxury. And now there is a need, but there are no laws, no traditions, no self-defense capabilities left.
You can protest and the politicians will ignore you, because any media attention give to you will favor the Muslims and disfavor you. The politicians have no need, on a propaganda and PR level, to address your concerns. This is the consequence of a majority rule system which is what the British Parliament is. Majority Rules.
And since the Labour party can get just as many votes from their Muslim and Islamic conquerors as they can get the whities, they have no reason to listen to you. You do not have the gun pointed at their heads, but the Muslims have the bomb waiting for Labour to step out of line.
As one example, consider Jack Straw. He did not support laws protecting homeowners from thieves, until he himself had to chase down some burglars. It is only when you bring the powerful to the knees and smash their faces into the same concrete as had felt the blood of many millions of others, that they will listen. Until then, you have a system which needs to be reformed, but the politicians that can reform it need it to stay exactly the way it is.
And now we run into the same problem in the United States. We need term limits, we need to eliminate the power structures held by the “seniority” clique of racists and murderers, like Ted Kennedy. There is no way to regenerate America until you eliminate those at the top holding the rest of us in thrall to their corrupt interests and business associates.
But the people in charge of dictating the laws of Congressional salaries and the laws of Congressional term limits… do not want to distribute the power from themselves to the rest of us or to their new and upcoming Senators and Congresscritters. They must be forced to do so, if the nation is to be saved. It is not like voting them out will solve anything. It is the system that has become corrupt, because the system has been modified by the likes of Byrd and Kennedy for DECADES. More than some of us have been alive, my fellow Americans. Think of the amount of damage such people can do in such a time. Damage far in excess of any attempt by anyone, including McCain or Bush, to “fix”.
You must purge the bureaucrats that sustain the power of Congress and the Congressmen and women who sustain the power of the bureaucrats by changing the rules of the system so that they can no longer screw the rest of us, no matter how corrupt they are, no matter how long they have been in office.
People talk about small government, but it is not a small government that we need, it is a change in government, in both the institutions and the people in the institutions. A complete overhaul, a systemic purge, and a Reform Movement on the scale of the Protestant Reformation.
If the UK is “too late” with just a 2% Muslim population then pretty much nowhere is safe. Though I suppose (with immigration being what it is) the US is going to end up as a Hispanic country long before then…
Given a choice between hispanics and muslims, I’ll take hispanics. Though I don’t much like the choice. And to be honest, there’s still some residual effect of the muslim occupation of Spain that shows up in the Mexicans. It has been diluted, but it’s still there.
Hmmm… Tacos v Halal curries, a difficult choice
If the UK is “too late” with just a 2% Muslim population then pretty much nowhere is safe.
The active revolutionaries diligently mobilizing Americans against the British did not constitute much more than 3% of the population.
It is not the numbers that count. The Western system of indoctrination concerning “democracy” and “majority rules” have blinded people to the fact that numbers do not count, fervor and motivation does.
I doubt any institution in the West openly teaches that “majority rules” simply translates to “rule by the few over the many”. And the logic of that process is irrefutable and also inescapable.
You’re assuming that 100% of that 2% is active & revolutionary. IMO we’ve the same situation in the Northern Ireland conflict where 5% of the specific population fight on “our” side, 5% on the opposition and the remaining 90% basically sit on their hands and wait to see who wins. While being absurdly over-sensitive about about the treatment of the “revoilutionaries” and the screw-ups and discrimination inevitable in any conflict, of course.
You’re assuming that 100% of that 2% is active & revolutionary.
To be a good Muslim is to obey Sharia and the laws of Mohammed.
You don’t need to be activist, for Mohammed has determined your course for your our submission under God, Allah.
It does not take all of the 3% percenters to be the “leaders” and “movers”. That was left to a handful of men, but it was done the same.
The situation demonstrably speaks for itself. The Muslim population may only be 2% but it has already had a significant impact on British government and societal norms. Can you imagine what it will be like when it reaches 10%? It will surely reach that level; remember “we will out reproduce you”.
The Muslim population may only be 2% but it has already had a significant impact on British government and societal norms.
That’s more to do with being governed by idiots than the inevitability of any such impact.
When you are governed by the corrupt oligarchy that was the Roman Senate class, the fall of Rome was indeed inevitable.
We want laws brought in to stop preachers of hate operating here.
We’ve already got those laws. It’s just that nobody has the will to enforce them…
It’s just that nobody has the will to enforce them…
That’s what happens when you have laws banning people from learning how to defend themselves without the need for the police or Mama Government.
>>We’ve already got those laws. It’s just that nobody has the will to enforce them…>>
Well…that plus the fact that the press, the courts, and the police seem to think that hate speech is a one way street, and muslims at the giving end are perfectly fine. It’s what we here in America call “reverse racism” since the commies haven’t quite got the “hate crime/speech” nonsense into law yet.
It’s coming, but we don’t have it yet.