Only his hairdresser knows for sure.
Bookworm on May 29 2009 at 1:27 pm | Filed under: Uncategorized
The one thing we know for sure is that the lapdog media, which considered Reagan’s hair color a matter of top priority, has been discretely silent about Obama’s relationship with the bottle (the dye bottle, that is).
Email This Post To A Friend
10 Responses to “Only his hairdresser knows for sure.”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.







Hell, I don’t care about the dye job — I wonder if he’s getting it straightened. I swear it was curly during the campaign.
This looked like a good spot for a totally off-topic link…
http://nhsblogdoc.blogspot.com/2009/05/abusing-mentally-ill.html
I’ve been reading this particular blog off and on due to the Nationalized health question. I thought I’d like to read what non-politically focussed people thought about it. Off hand, I’d guess that he’d be happier without it, but he hasn’t really said so clearly. Maybe if GB didn’t have the NHS, he’d be just as dissatisfied…I don’t know.
But I thought this was interesting.
Here’s another one: same topic.
http://crypticsubterranean.blogspot.com/2009/05/cost-cutting-treatments.html
Ymar…for you! The post is nothing…but read the comments.
http://sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com/2009/05/presaging-chapter-in-absolved.html
Ok…here’s an interesting one on racism. You know – we should appoint Sotomayor because she’s “hispanic”… It seems that – as Sadie’s link pointed out – that we have a very simplistic view of what racism is. We tend to look at it as ‘black and white’ when in fact, it’s much more “nuanced”. There are shades of brown, so to speak. Actually, it may be deadly serious, but it’s kind of funny. Kind of stupid, actually.
http://www.thereturnofscipio.com/?p=1979
As long as I’m on the health care kick:
http://www.boston.com/news/health/articles/2009/05/15/waits_to_see_hub_doctors_grow_longer/
Looks like it isn’t a GB problem – it’s a bureaucracy problem. Quelle surprise. Who’d a guessed!
Wow. Some of you may already be familiar with this – the Jon Stewart thing. I’ve heard about it, but don’t watch Jon Stewart, so didn’t know exactly what the fuss was about. Here’s a response to the accusation (for which Stewart later apologized) that Truman was a war criminal. Pretty good reading.
http://pajamasmedia.com/ejectejecteject/2009/05/19/the-truth-about-the-atomic-bombs-print-version/
Last (for now, anyway) but not least:
http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2009/05/as-close-to-dictatorship-as-this.html
I was not familiar with the Jon Stewart fuss. I really stay away from the surreal whenever I can.
I cannot understand why Clifford May would engage in any dialogue with Stewart, who would be the sitting at the desk of ‘Surrender Central’ during any war at any time.
Thanks, suek, I’m touched.