Things are not going well for Mr. Obama in Washington. (Please note the studied lack of an honorific in the way I am referring to the man in the White House. I don’t think he worked hard enough to earn it. The things we learn when we listen to our BabBoxer tapes.) I mean, what in the world is he to think when even Sen. Harry Reid directly opposes him regarding Israel?
The United States needs to back off Israel a little and put some pressure [on] the Palestinians instead, US Senator and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid told US President Barack Obama in a letter.
Reid, a Democrat from Nevada, wrote that he believes “negotiations will be successful only with a renewed commitment from the Palestinians to be a true partner in peace.”
“Arab states in the region must also act to support the peace process. All parties must recognize Israel’s right to exist, end terrorism, and respect previous agreements made with Israel,” he added in the letter.
Taking an opposite stance to Obama’s, Reid suggested in the letter that dealing with Iran’s nuclear program would aid in advancing the Arab-Israel peace process, rather than the other way around.
“It is… vital (the peace) process not take away from your commitment to deal with the ongoing threat from Iran… I believe that resolving the problem of Iran’s nuclear program will help facilitate the Arab-Israeli peace process,” Reid wrote.
I really didn’t think Reid had it in him. I don’t generally admire him either as a man or a politician. However, I am impressed by and appreciate his willingness to take a stand against Obama regarding Israel’s security.
UPDATE: Commenters, so far, aren’t impressed by what Reid did. I am impressed on two grounds. First, having built Obama up as the political messiah, even reading polls can’t make it that easy to turn on him. Second, speaking of polls, the fact that Reid was willing to stand against Obama means that the wheels are coming off the Obama bus.