I’ve been quiet about a lot of the revolutions in the Middle East. The only one as to which I was really vocal was the attempted revolution in Iran — and that was because I thought the uprising could only benefit America. That regime is so evil, that destabilizing it for awhile, even if would eventually be replaced by an equally bad regime, would still be good for us. As long as Obama is in the White House, the bare minimum that would benefit America would be to buy time until a competent, pro-American (and, one hopes, pro-Israel) president is in the White House. Obama, of course, was conspicuously absent during the attempted Iranian uprising, and I can’t fault him enough for that silence.
As for the other “revolutions” . . . .
Tunisia did not affect America one way or another. It was short, sweet, and seemed to have a good outcome for the citizens, which is a blessing, and I’m pleased for them.
Egypt!? Oy. Mubarak was a slimeball but he was our slimeball. He kept the peace with Israel and he did not threaten American interests. Obama’s first response was to say nothing, then he said nothing useful, then he suddenly announced that Mubarak had to go, then he didn’t know what to do after having made that announcement, and then it became clear that he had no idea what to do in the vacuum following Mubarak’s departure.
Right now, Egypt is poised on the knife’s edge, as the Muslim Brotherhood, having waited for this moment for decades, slowly and carefully begins to consolidate power. The MB is helped by the fact that this radical, nationalist, sharia oriented movement got the official Obama stamp of approval. I’m not saying the Egyptian revolution could have been stopped or (since I lack a crystal ball) that it will be a bad thing in the long term. I am saying, however, that Obama proved himself totally inept and incapable of shaping the situation to America’s advantage. He was a reactor, not an actor.
In Libya, Obama again plays the helpless idiot. He cedes leadership to France, which seizes it with gusto but that doesn’t mean that the seizure is to America’s benefit. Libya’s oil supply is neither here nor there for us. He’s now snuck is into a war that not only confers zero benefit on us, but that aids al Qaeda, which is currently trying to kill our troops in Afghanistan. There is no good outcome here.
Three revolutions, three missteps by Obama. Meanwhile, he and his State Department made all sorts of silly noises about President Assad being a reformer, despite the fact that his is one of the most evil, corrupt regimes in the world, not to mention the fact that it’s hand in hand with Iran.
So then, Syria blows up. And what does the Obama administration do? Nothing. Burned twice, and trapped by its own recent word’s praising Assad’s presidency, it’s paralyzed. The problem is that, Syria, like Iran, is a place where a revolution is not necessarily bad for America’s interests. The Syrian people might go from the frying pan into the fire, which would be unfortunate for them, but we, at least would buy time. A country in disarray is not usually a country that is capable of pursuing evil against nations outside its border.
The score for Obama is four revolutions and four leadership failures. Sadly, given America’s staggering but still existent preeminence, that’s the exact same score for the Americans, the Israelis, the Egyptians, the Iranians and, so far, the Syrians.Email This Post To A Friend
11 Responses to “Syria — random thoughts”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.