Oh, it finally happened!
The Liberal/Left Media has found two or more women willing to claim that Herman Cain was guilty of “sexually suggestive” language, thereby graduating the Liberal/Left’s “step n’ fetchit” caricaturization of Herman Cain to that of the predatory black male. Read that again, “sexually suggestive language”. What is that supposed to mean? Did these women overhear Cain discussing the relative merits of pizza pepperonis?
My first reaction is that, if true, such suggestive language should only endear a candidate to the Democrats. Witness the behaviors of Kennedy(s), LBJ, Clinton, Edwards, Gore, Jesse Jackson and company. Had Cain actually pawed women, the Democrats would claim him to be one of their own.
My second reaction is as follows: either come up with a semen-stained dress or go pound sand, hypocrites!
My third reaction to ask why it is that people, especially black people, can’t see through the profound racism that courses through Democrat veins?
This is pretty much Clarence Thomas redux. The difference, this time, is that we’ve already seen the playbook.