George Soros: A missing moral compass

In my “real” facebook world, there’s been a lot of outrage over Glenn Beck’s excavation of George Soros’ adolescent work for the Nazis, work Soros (a Jew) engaged in to stay alive while passing as a Christian in Nazi occupied territory.  Liberals howl “How dare Beck judge Soros? ” But is that what Beck is doing or is Beck judging the person that helpless boy grew up to become?  I don’t know, because I don’t watch Beck, but here is the argument I would make if I had Beck’s forum.

A lot of people have, through circumstances, been forced to do heinous things to survive.  As a child, I certainly met my fair share, since I grew up in a world of Holocaust and Killing Field survivors.  I knew people who worked dragging bodies out of the ovens; I knew people who sorted the teeth and hair removed from the dead bodies; I knew people who worked as slave labor in the factories, making weapons the Nazis used against the Allies; I knew Germans who survived Soviet concentration camps; and I knew people who survived the Killing Fields in ways that too terrible for them to describe.  I wouldn’t dream of judging them.  I have no right to judge, and I have no will to judge them.  When one is completely brutalized and intentionally de-humanized, one does things that would be unthinkable in ordinary circumstances.

What distinguishes all the people I knew, though, when compared to George Soros is the fact that they judged themselves.  Without exception, each knew that, even though unwillingly, he or she had been complicit in deeply immoral acts, and each spent a lifetime seeking redemption.  All of them worked hard and were exemplary citizens, whether that simply meant avoiding doing harm or whether it involved more active engagement in altruistic acts.  Neither the absence of external judgment nor their own knowledge that they were responding to overwhelming external forces took that edge off.  They suffered twice, first in the doing and then in the ever-lasting guilt.  But it was the guilt that made them people of exceptional decency and humanity.

Just yesterday, I read a book describing another such soul.  The book is Anthony Flacco’s The Road Out of Hell: Sanford Clark and the True Story of the Wineville Murders. For those unfamiliar with the story, as I was when I picked up the book, Sanford Clark was a 13 year old boy who, in 1928, ended up living on an isolated chicken farm with his uncle.  Unfortunately for Sanford, his uncle was a psychopathic serial killer who abducted young boys, brutally raped and generally tortured them, and then murdered them. Sanford differed from those boys only in that his uncle needed his labor, so stopped short of murdering him. Sometimes the “labor” his uncle demanded consisted of feeding the imprisoned boys, digging their graves or even participating in their murders.

When the uncle was finally arrested, Sanford was the chief witness against him.  (By the way, I’m not telling you anything that’s not on the book jacket.  This is not a suspense story; it’s the day-to-day details that make it riveting.)  Where things get really interesting is the life Sanford led after he was finally rescued from this hell hole.  He was consumed by guilt, but his moral compass demanded that his act of contrition consisted of leading a good life.  He worked hard, married, fought in WWII, and raised children.  He was well-liked in his community.  He could never forget what he had seen and done, nor could he forgive himself, but his moral compass demanded that he contribute to the world as best he could.

All of these stories, the ones I heard growing up, or the ones we read about in books such as The Road Out of Hell, have a clear message:  even the most horrific youthful experiences need not destroy a conscience.  Soros, however, seems to have no conscience whatsoever about his complicity with the Nazis.  Unlike the people I knew growing up, who lived with and worked daily to expiate their guilt, when he looks back, he’s good with it all.  When Soros was interviewed about his wartime experiences on 60 Minutes, he expressed no regret whatsoever (emphasis added):

KROFT: (Voiceover) And you watched lots of people get shipped off to the death camps.

Mr. SOROS: Right. I was 14 years old. And I would say that that’s when my character was made.

KROFT: In what way?

Mr. SOROS: That one should think ahead. One should understand and–and anticipate events and when–when one is threatened. It was a tremendous threat of evil. I mean, it was a–a very personal experience of evil.

KROFT: My understanding is that you went out with this protector of yours who swore that you were his adopted godson.

Mr. SOROS: Yes. Yes.

KROFT: Went out, in fact, and helped in the confiscation of property from the Jews.

Mr. SOROS: Yes. That’s right. Yes.

KROFT: I mean, that’s–that sounds like an experience that would send lots of people to the psychiatric couch for many, many years. Was it difficult?

Mr. SOROS: Not–not at all. Not at all. Maybe as a child you don’t–you don’t see the connection. But it was–it created no–no problem at all.

KROFT: No feeling of guilt?

Mr. SOROS: No.

KROFT: For example that, ‘I’m Jewish and here I am, watching these people go. I could just as easily be there. I should be there.’ None of that?

Mr. SOROS: Well, of course I c–I could be on the other side or I could be the one from whom the thing is being taken away. But there was no sense that I shouldn’t be there, because that was–well, actually, in a funny way, it’s just like in markets–that if I weren’t there–of course, I wasn’t doing it, but somebody else would–would–would be taking it away anyhow. And it was the–whether I was there or not, I was only a spectator, the property was being taken away. So the–I had no role in taking away that property. So I had no sense of guilt.

The only real question one is left with after reading the above is whether Soros was always a sociopath, or whether the war made him one.  As I said, I know people who went through worse than he did, and came out human.  He didn’t.  He came out a very intelligent animal, by which I mean that he lacks the moral compass that, to me, is the single most important distinction between humans and animals.

So, whatever Glenn Beck said, he’s right that there’s a problem with Soros’ engagement with the Nazis during the War:  The problem with Soros isn’t what he did to survive; it’s that he doesn’t care what he did to survive.

Cross-posted at Right Wing News

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments

  1. suek says

    Only one thing that I know of that can be said in his defense – at the time, they (he) didn’t know that the Jews were being sent to death camps.  That they were being sent to prisons of some sort, yes, but the existence of death camps as such wasn’t known until after the war.
     
    Still, apparently, even when the truth _was_ known, he had to know his part, and apparently that has caused him no distress.
     
    I don’t  understand what motivates him.

  2. SADIE says

    The camps, were known. They were known to some here in the U.S. What was known and what was published and acknowledged are two distinct histories.
     
    The Schwartz family changed their name in 1936 to Soros, supposedly due to the political climate. George would have been 6 at the time. Soros’ mother at some point converted to Christianity(from what I’ve read, she never cared much being Jewish). By 1947 George was living in the UK and his parents did not join him until sometime in the 1950′s. When I read the background on Soros, what I see is a ghost – nothing human.
     
     
     

  3. Charles Martel says

    Rather than conduct himself as Sanford Clark did, George Soros chose the opposite path. As a result, he has killed everything inside of him that might have felt compassion for his fellow Jews. The one thing that remains living is a fierce desire to destroy the only remaining moral system that can judge him and find him wanting. If only George can topple the West, he might finally squelch whatever distant, but nagging, reminders of the evil he did.

  4. Leah says

    Thank you for clarifying exactly what I have been feeling. He had no problem confiscating Jewish property during the war or later bankrupting the Bank of England and destroying many innocent lives.
    Some people are evil, he is one, I doubt the war made him that way, it simply reinforced what was already there.

  5. jj says

    He didn’t tell Kroft, but he did elaborate further with Time magazine: “1944 was the best year of my life.”  You missed that part of it.  The son of a bitch enjoyed it when he was young, it made him feel like he was hot stuff.  The world rarely sees anyone like this, generally someone kills them before they get beyond their youth, but when they do survive into adulthood they’re monsters.  This is a monster.

Trackbacks

  1. Its Their Nature…

    Character counts, whether we are talking about individuals or the characteristics which sum to form the base for a culture. Character is the organization of defenses, identifications, and drive derivatives that define a person’s identity; these traits…

  2. Watcher’s Council nominations…

    * Snapped Shot – Jailed by the World’s Perfect Government * Joshuapundit – JCS Mullen: ‘We Can Stop Islamic Extremism by Teaching People to Read The Qu’ran…’ * The Razor – Why Two Friends Hate Sarah Palin * Bookworm……

  3. Watcher’s Council Results…

    Here are the results of this week’s excercise in blogging excellence! Council Winners *First place with 2 votes! – Joshuapundit–JCS Mullen: ‘We Can Stop Islamic Extremism by Teaching People to Read The Qu’ran…’Second place*t* with 1 2/3 votes – Bookw…

Leave a Reply