It’s already old news to you that statistical data shows that Obama is the most polarizing president ever. Much as I’d like to blame Obama, it seems that, rather than causing the polarization, he reflects it:
One Gallup chart ranks presidents from Eisenhower to Obama on polarization during their third year in office. Obama is at the very top, with a 68-point “party gap.” The three least polarized presidents were Jimmy Carter in 1979, Lyndon Johnson in 1965 and Ike in 1955. Carter was very unpopular (24% approval among Republicans, 46% among Democrats), Ike was very popular (91% and 57%), and LBJ’s popularity was middling (34% and 68%).
In a polarized electorate, then, partisans not only are more likely to disapprove of a president of the other party but also to approve of one from their own party. Cilizza and Blake note that “out of the ten most partisan years in terms of presidential job approval in Gallup data, seven–yes, seven–have come since 2004. [George W.] Bush had a run between 2004 and 2007 in which the partisan disparity of his job approval was at 70 points or higher.” What they don’t note is that polarization declined significantly in 2008 (to a 61-point gap), when even Republicans had started to turn against Bush.
Obama’s fault, then, lies in promising during his campaign to end this great divide and then in violating that promise by using his executive office to perpetuate it.
If you’re wondering how this chasm happened, a reader send me some information that might give us a clue:
I supervise a USC School of Social Work intern. I was filling out my evaluation for her today.
Here are two of the categories that I had to “grade” her on.
“Recognize the extent to which a culture’s structure and values may oppress, marginalize, alienate, or create or enhance privilege and power in shaping life experiences.”
“Identifies the forms, mechanisms and interconnections of oppression and discrimination and is knowledgeable about theories of justice and strategies to promote human and civil rights.”
Our very expensive educational institutions are fomenting class warfare. This young woman, when she gets her degree and goes out into the world, will disseminate this Marxist view of social issues. She won’t be a bad person. She’ll be a dangerously indoctrinated useful idiot in a position to do a lot of damage to the fabric of our culture.Email This Post To A Friend
One Response to “Why America’s cultural divide is a gaping chasm, not a shallow ditch”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.