When God closes a door, he sometimes opens a window
In the wake of Sarah Palin’s appearance on the national political scene, some Obama supporters made some pretty deranged statements about the Palin family decision to go ahead with a pregnancy when they knew that the baby would have Down Syndrome. There was a lot of eugenics-type talk about the social utility of handicapped children (none) and the societal wisdom of destroying them (huge).
To those of us who have been paying attention for periods longer than this political season, these ugly outbursts weren’t surprising. After all, Pete Singer, “dean” of American ethicists (with a chair at Princeton), and founder of the American animal rights movement, has long advocated that it is ethical to give parents a 30 day window after a child’s birth within which to destroy the child should the parents deem it defective. Singer, like others with his statist views, have a peculiarly Utopian view of the perfectibility of humans, one which depends, not on moral growth, but on government force.
And yes, you’re not imaging it — Hitler did in fact put this ideology into effect. Aside from trying to kill entire races he deemed defective, such as Jews and Gypsies, he was also big on genetic management, which involved prostituting German women to SS forces to make “perfect” Aryan babies and, on the flip side, killing those Aryans he deemed defective. My uncle on the Christian side of the family was gassed because he was a manic-depressive. This is what happens when the state makes decisions because, as I’ve said before, the state has no conscience.
The most clear and recent statement of this principle came from yet another famed “ethicist,” this one in England (emphasis mine):
Elderly people suffering from dementia should consider ending their lives because they are a burden on the NHS and their families, according to the influential medical ethics expert Baroness Warnock.
The veteran Government adviser said pensioners in mental decline are “wasting people’s lives” because of the care they require and should be allowed to opt for euthanasia even if they are not in pain.
She insisted there was “nothing wrong” with people being helped to die for the sake of their loved ones or society.
The 84-year-old added that she hoped people will soon be “licensed to put others down” if they are unable to look after themselves.
Her comments in a magazine interview have been condemned as “immoral” and “barbaric”, but also sparked fears that they may find wider support because of her influence on ethical matters.
Lady Warnock, a former headmistress who went on to become Britain’s leading moral philosopher, chaired a landmark Government committee in the 1980s that established the law on fertility treatment and embryo research.
In the statist world, it is impossible for those the statists deem defective to have any value. It’s the one gaping hole in their identity politics world view. Everyone has a protectible identity except the handicapped who are either very young (fetal and infantile) or very old.
I mention all this for a reason. Don Quixote forwarded an email to me about Paul Smith. Have you ever heard of Paul Smith? I hadn’t ’til now, but I think meeting him and his work is very important as we tremble on the brink of becoming a truly statist state, with the same universal health care that led the “moral philosopher” of Britain to advocate the mass slaughter of Britain’s helpless elderly.
Here’s an abbreviated version of Smith’s bio from the Foundation set up to honor him and his work:
Paul was born in Philadelphia on September 21, 1921.
Although severe cerebral palsy kept him out of school, it didn’t prevent him from having a remarkable life.
Never having a chance as a child to receive a formal education, Paul taught himself to become a master artist as well as a terrific chess player.
[snip]
His incredible visualization and calculation skills helped to make him a formidable chess player. Paul would stop doing just about anything else when he had a chance to play a game!
When typing, Paul used his left hand to steady his right one.
Since he couldn’t press two keys at the same time, he almost always locked the shift key down and made his pictures using the symbols at the top of the number keys.
In other words, his pictures were based on these characters …
@ # $ % ^ & * ( ) _
Across seven decades, Paul created hundreds of pictures. He often gave the originals away. Sometimes, but not always, he kept or received a copy for his own records.
You should read the whole bio, which you’ll find here.
And what work are we talking about? The incredible pictures he created using ten keys on an old fashioned typewriter. You can see those pictures here, at the Paul Smith Foundation’s Web Gallery.
Are they the greatest art in the world? Nope. Not even close. The Louvre or the Met would not be interested. Nevertheless, they are extraordinary and very pleasing to the eye — and that’s entirely separate from the awe one feels when one considers the physical work and the mental vision that went into creating them.
I’m no saint. I give thanks daily that, despite being an older mother, both my children were born without Down Syndrome or any of the other genetic diseases nature tosses out. I’d like to think that, had something bad happened, I could have handled it, but I simply don’t know.
I do know, though, that I’m am finding increasingly horrifying the open-faced calls from the statists demanding the death of the imperfect. I’ll therefore end this post with a slightly modified version of Pastor Martin Niemoller’s famous poem (versions of which you can see here):
First they came for the Communists,
– but I was not a communist so I did not speak out.
Then they came for those born with handicaps,
– but I was born without handicaps so I did not speak out.
Then they came for the Socialists and the Trade Unionists,
– but I was neither, so I did not speak out.
Then they came for the Jews,
– but I was not a Jew so I did not speak out.
And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me.
It’s frightening how neatly my little interlineation fits into that poem, isn’t it?
(Right now, the gallery links aren’t working, but you can still get an idea of his work just by going to the gallary main page. I’ll contact the gallery and see if they can fix the problem.)
UPDATE: More on those gifted lives that the raving Left now freely discusses snuffing.