San Francisco mulls expanding gay rights program at expense of academic programs *UPDATED*

[UPDATE:  The school board stopped mulling and decided to act.]

Last week, I wrote a long, ruminative post questioning how far a democracy must go to protect its minorities.  Stepping in, right on cue, the San Francisco School District, which is facing a disastrous budget shortfall, is considering a huge expansion in a program aimed and supporting the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered youth within the school district.  Put simply, the City is seriously contemplating further destroying academic opportunities for the many in order to engage in statistics and psychobabble for the few:

With everything from art classes, summer school and jobs on the chopping block this year, the San Francisco school board will decide this week whether to greatly expand school services, support and instruction on issues of sexual orientation.

The decision could cost the school district, which is facing a $113 million budget shortfall over the next two years, at least $120,000 a year – enough cash to cover the salaries of two classroom teachers.

The school board is expected to vote Tuesday on the fiscally controversial resolution calling for San Francisco Unified to add a new full-time staffer to manage “lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and questioning” youth issues in the district’s Student Support Services Department.

It also would require the district to track harassment and discrimination based on sexual orientation and distribute an educational packet to parents, encouraging them to discuss “the issues of sexuality, gender identity and safety” with their children.

That commitment probably would cost about $90,000 a year for the staffer and maybe another $30,000 for the rest.

Read the rest here.  It is worth remembering at this point that, even by generous estimates, those gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered students constitute only a very small portion of the San Francisco student population:

Various estimates of percentage of US population that is gay:

Average guess by polled Americans: 21% of men, 22% of women

Alfred Kinsey’s Sexual Behavior in the Human Male: 10%

National Gay and Lesbian Task Force: 3% to 8%

The Family Research Report: 2% to 3% of men, 2% of women

The 2000 US Census Bureau: less than 1%

It’s also worth thinking about how San Francisco’s school system currently ranks (and this ranking is before the projected cuts to academics have gone into effect).  Out of 752 school districts in California, San Francisco comes in at 382 — a little over halfway to the bottom. It could certainly be worse, but considering San Francisco’s prestige and sophistication, that’s a pretty pathetic showing.

Of course, San Francisco isn’t alone in this desire to appease minority sensibilities at the expense of the majority.  Berkeley, right across the Bay, garnered significant headlines when its school district proposed cutting science programs (that is, solidly academic programs) because not enough minorities were signing up for them.  After an uproar from parents who care more about their children’s education than parading them as sacrificial lambs to Progressive politics, the school district has backed off the plan, at least for now.

What’s so fascinating about these Progressive initiatives is that they are not being put in place to address manifest wrongs.  That is, I don’t see any argument that black and Hispanic students are being discouraged from taking science classes in Berkeley, or that they are the subjects of rank discrimination.  Likewise, the San Francisco school district isn’t using an epidemic of anti-gay violence to justify redirecting funds from academics to a designated victim group.  Instead, this is simply the Progressive mindset at work:  minorities are victims; victims need reparations; within the context of public education, reparations come in the form of denying academic opp0rtunities to all students (including, of course, the victims themselves).

I know I’m sounding like a broken record, but I’m beginning to think that, provided Obama doesn’t bankrupt us or Iran bomb us, Obama’s election may be a blessing in disguise.  Progressives outside of power managed to convince vast swathes of America that Progressives were interested only in the good of all, while inherently evil conservatives were dedicated to the destruction of everyone but white males (plus a few pro-Life pseudo-females).

The election, however, has gone to the Progressives’ heads.  They are revealing themselves in all their ugliness.  When it comes to education, their goal isn’t to educate children, but to indoctrinate them in an anti-American, anti-Israel curriculum that elevates victim status over academics.  On abortion, they’re not pro-Choice, but pro-Death.  On national security, their anti-Bush diatribes proved to be rooted in an affinity with the terrorists over the interests and security of Americans.  Their ostensible concern about the economy is merely an umbrella to transfer all wealth to the government.

You can add to this list, ’cause you know where I’m going.  Before the election, we saw the eternally pure and youthful Dorian Gray; now we see the picture in which reposes all the actual ugliness and evil.

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments

  1. Bill Smith says

    Bookie,
    I agree, as usual.
     
    A central problem with liberalism is their total lack of understanding of wealth:
    “Their ostensible concern about the economy is merely an umbrella to transfer all wealth to the government.”
    You are right, and they are wrong. You can certainly “transfer” (steal) money, and assets like factories, farmland, etc. But that is not wealth. We see this EVERY time socialists/communists/anarchists take over. The economic  system simply falls apart, because wealth is not MONEY. It is creativity, guts, initiative, perseverance, education, organizational skills, intelligence, and a bunch of other things — NONE of which can be “transferred.”

  2. Bill Smith says

    Yes, ExCat,
    “… minorities are victims; victims need reparations…” to keep them dependent on the superior liberal minds who beneficently decide how they should live, and what type of lighting devices they can own, and how much water their toilets can flush, and whether their children can have vending machines in their lunchrooms!

  3. Mike Devx says

    It’s hard to keep all the victim classes in my head.  I’ve been mulling the Great Global Warming Movement Collapse, and the upset at Copenhagen.  Those who were really upset:  All the victim countries that were just… that… close… to getting “reparations” from the rich countries to offset the global warming threat to their countries.  We came awfully close to seeing billions upon billions of taxpayer dollars seized to redistribute, based on the fraudulent, lying claims of so-called global warming scientists.  How close we came.  Victim countries seizing the tax dollars of other countries!
     

  4. Bill Smith says

    Well, let’s, those of us who are so inclined, give a chuckle of thanks to God for this great, hellacious romper stomper THUMPER of a winter — right where it needed to be in Copenhagen, and Washington, DC — we are having right on time to dot any i’s. and cross any t’s to those silly, juvenile emails, and other nonsense of the 21st Century Salem Witch Trials in which our entire economy, our way of life were almost burned at the stake due to blind ignorance masquerading as superior knowledge, and just plain human evil greed.

Trackbacks

  1. Watcher’s Council nominations…

    * Mere Rhetoric – Wonderful: Obama Blocking Apache Sales To Israel, “Dismayed” At Use During Cast Lead * Wolf Howling – Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, Don’t Change * Rhymes With Right – Obama Supports Jim Crow Law To Oppose……

  2. Submitted 02/11/10…

    Before we go to this week’s list of Watcher’s Council nominations, there’s some serious business. Fellow council member and friend, JoshuaPundit suffered a mild heart attack on Monday. Here’s a wish for a Refua Shlaima – a complete recovery! And no…

  3. Council speak 02/15/10…

    The Council has spoken. Winning Council Submissions First place with 2 1/3 points! – American Digest – Barack Obama: Imaginary Friend of Democrats. Cause and Cure. Second place with 2 points – (T*) – The Razor – Symbols Aren’t Leaders Second place wit…

  4. Watcher’s Council Results…

    Winning Council Submissions First place with 2 1/3 points! – American Digest – Barack Obama: Imaginary Friend of Democrats. Cause and Cure.Second place with 2 points – (T*) – The Razor – Symbols Aren’t LeadersSecond place with 2 points –……

Leave a Reply